Sunday, May 26, 2013

Muslim Threatens to Slit My Throat Over New Video

16 comments:

Justin said...

That was an excellent response to the first statement. How can one be expected to learn "truth" from the best of all deceivers and from his deceitful followers?

Of course, they can claim to be truthful, but that itself could be a lie as well.

The whole slithing thing is funny.

If you can't win an argument through reason and truth, win through slithing.

;-)

apran said...

9:14 Fight them; Allah will punish them by your hands and will disgrace them and give you victory over them and satisfy the breasts of a believing people

Funny that Allah commands the muslims to kill the enemies, and yet Allah doesn't help the muslims at all. Allah must be full of crap.

Traeh said...

Enjoy David while we have him, because the way he responds to these guys, you have to wonder how long he'll be here.

May God let it be another 100 years before his martyrdom.

Joe Bradley said...

Obviously Abdull suffers from a variety of mental and emotional defects. Ya see, it all started out early in life for poor Abdull, right after he flunked out of Kindergarten. From there he sought solace in the Mosque where he discovered that the Imam was as much of a scholastic failure as he was because the Imam flunked out of the first grade.

In his teen years his spirits were temporarily lifted when he attempted to model his life on that of his prophet, but he was quickly arrested and discovered that conjugal relations with 9 year old girls was illegal.

He is now left to make idle threats on jail house computers and spend his life dreaming about his prophet and Aisha.

What a shame.

Deleting said...

Anyone else notice when David gives him fact about Islam and doesn't direct it as a personal attack, muslims go NUTS.

As a matter of fact, more and more we're seeing psychotic muslims coming to this blog, most all of them western converts who 'have no interest in dialoguing' but call us to either talk to muslims or read the koran but not both.

And then they end their 'polite' rant with some polemic attack.

Almost always it is on the heels of some muslim acting out their religion.

Anyone else seeing that as of late?

Why?

Mary said...

Jihadists, like their Liberal/Progressive useful idiots, have no real argument, so they have to resort to childish name-calling, personal attacks, lies, and shrieking, "Nah-ah! Nah-ah!"

The "context" of the Qur'an is the Sunnah (Mohammad's example) which interprets the Qur'an. Shariah law is based on this interpretation, and the standard of law is what would Mohammad do? (What did he supposedly get away with that is . . . )

bam bamba said...

The bible says by their fruits you shall know them. Do you expect anything from the true followers of islam that will be better than what their prophet did?
We would expect muslims to follow this examples of mohammed. Examples so disgraceful that only blind followership can sustain it.
In the face of superior argument and reasoning , their only recourse is to threaten violence and mayhem. Did I hear David Cameron say the abomination that happened at Woolwich is a betrayal of Islam? How ridiculous!

Joe Bradley said...

How right you are bam bamba!

Mr. Bloodyhands was an orthodox Muslim following the instructions outlined in the Qur'an. THIS is what Islam is really all about, NOT some pie-in-the-sky notion of a peaceful religion.

Mike Smith said...

I was under the impression that Mohammed and Allah are the final word in Islam. I thought that the Quran was the perfect message from the perfect god for all mankind.
Is Javaad Mazhar effectively saying that he or any other muslim know more about Islam than Mohammed or Allah? Is Javadd telling us that the Quran is so imperfect, that it cannot be understood by all mankind, and can only be explained by Javaad or some other Muslim who is not Mohammed or someone who is not Allah? Is Javaad more suited to explaining Islam than Allah?

parisclaims said...

The video exposing Cameron & Boris as liars was just about the best thing I've seen on youtube.

Van Grungy said...

David,

I heard that there is a command to muslims not to allow the quran to enter non-muslim lands lest it be captured and studied by non-muslims.
Do you know about this? If so, would you please point out that reference for us as. I think it's important because, if the scripture or scholarly advice exists, it would show that 'learning from muslims' is about avoiding the quran being read by non-muslims.

Thanks

Kanyanga Eberhard said...

THE TRUE WILL NEVER SHACK. THE TRUTH WILL REMAIN THE TRUTH IT WILL NEVER FALL OR SHACK BECAUSE ITS THE TRUTH. ISLAM CAN'T COMPETE ON THE TABLE OF LOGICAL AND REASONABLE DEBATE AND ARGUEMENT. WE ARE IN THE 21 CENTURY AND THIS IS ABOUT THINKING AND DEBATING ON RETARDED BELIEFS.IF YOU ARE A MUSLIM AND YOU BELIEVE THAT DAVID WOOD AND OTHER ARE MISINTERPRETING ISLAM, WHY CAN'T YOU GO TO THIER SHOW TO DEBATE THEM AND EMBARASS THEM ON LIVE TV ?

Ugo Strange said...

Ha David, you're a great warrior. Keep up the fight!!

Sam said...

This is for brother Van Gungry. Here are the hadiths that you asked for:

It has been narrated on the authority of Ibn 'Umar who said: The Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) forbade that one should travel to the land of the enemy taking the Qur'an with him. (Sahih Muslim, Book 020, Number 4607)

It has been narrated on the authority of Abdullah b. Umar that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) used to forbid that one should travel to the land of the enemy taking the Qur'an (with him) lest it should fall into the hands of the enemy. (Sahih Muslim, Book 020, Number 4608)

It has been narrated on the authority of Ibn 'Umar that the Messenger of Allah (may peace be upon him) said: Do not take the Qur'an on a journey with you, for I am afraid lost it should fall into the hands of the enemy. Ayyub (one of the narrators in the chain of transmitters) said: The enemy may seize it and may quarrel with you over it. (Sahih Muslim, Book 020, Number 4609)

Here is the link: www.searchtruth.com/book_display.php?book=020&translator=2&start=0&number=4607



Sam said...

Oops, I meant Van Grungy.

Tom ta tum Tom said...

Well, after all. Abdull must be a half-hearted Muslim.

And why do I write such things? Surely it is obvious to all who are true to the ummah (and to the day of judgement).

Abdull has only threatened to kill David - but Abdull has not promised to cook and EAT David.

A TRUE Muslim would have offered to all of us a halal recipe for making David into a meal for at least 19 slaves of Allahu Ohynkksmoor (and any hungry travelers who happen to be passing by).

@Abdull: you are a disgrace to the Islamic "maghrub". Do you even eat your own cooking? Please, demonstrate some respect. Show us a little less ma (mouth) and a lot more ghrub.

David, on behalf of all sincere followers of the Apusstle of Allahu Ohynkksmoor (may Peanut Butter & Jelly forever fill all his orifices), please allow me to apologize that Abdull has been so rude.

After he has been severely reprimanded (7200 lashes) by the Shura, we will prepare Abdull according to halal requirements (and we just may add some chopped Za'atar for good measure). In the far desert, he then will be served to the jackals of your choosing.

Allahu Ohynkksmoor!! Allahu Ohynkksmoor!!

KAFIR AND PROUD!!