Saturday, January 29, 2011

Robert Spencer vs. Imam Moustafa Zayed: Muhammad, Violence, and Subjugation

7 comments:

Roger said...

This would of been a great debate if Robert Spencer had a better person to debate him. Imam Moustafa Zayed is no match for Robert. That was obvious from the begining of the debate. I am not surprise tho'. There are very few true Muslims who can defend this unlogical idiology (Islamism).

Koala Bear said...

Robert Spencer proved it is true in 6 minutes. The other guy is a blatant liar so knows nothing about islam.

Fisher said...

Moustafa is really grasping at straws in that debate. Did he seriously just shrug off all the major commentators of the Qur'an? Smh...

Good job, Robert Spencer. You really showed people the truth in this debate. :-)

Fisher said...

By the way, for anyone interested, Moustafa has just posted his take on the debate on his website. See as he proclaims his own superiority despite the weakness of his argumentation:

http://theliesaboutmuhammad.com/?p=134

bhigr said...

The whole proposition was proved after quoting 9:29 and the hadith about fighting the people until they say there is no god but Allah. Then Robert quoted several mainstream tafsir as well as "The Reliance of the Traveller". The rest of the discussion was really pointless. Obfuscation, lying,...

Fernando said...

Just a comment... when will muslimes get sthraight Christian history? why are they so eagger to testifie thate they are so ignorant? can't simply be more accurate? oh, dear... islam really makes people stupid or unwilling to know the truthe...

Faith Hope said...

Video not found!