Wednesday, June 14, 2017

Zakir Naik Claims Muhammad Was a Gay Necrophile

In the Islamic hadith collection "Kanz al-Ummal," we read a disturbing story about Muhammad sleeping with a dead woman to ensure her place in paradise as his bride:
"Narrated by Ibn Abbas: 'I (Muhammad) put on her my shirt that she may wear the clothes of heaven, and I slept with her in her coffin (grave) that I may lessen the pressure of the grave. She was the best of Allah’s creatures to me after Abu Talib' . . . The prophet was referring to Fatima , the mother of Ali."
Since the word "slept" here can refer to sexual intercourse (as in the English sentence, "He slept with her"), some critics of Islam have suggested that Muhammad had sex with a dead woman.

Whether or not that's true, Muslim apologist Dr. Zakir Naik claims that Muhammad was a homosexual and a necrophile (someone who is sexually attracted to dead people). He makes this claim by arguing that Muhammad is mentioned by name in Song of Solomon 5:16 and that the Hebrew word "machmad" is the name "Muhammad." In this video, I point out the obvious implications of Naik's assertions.

5 comments:

Britt said...

Hi David,

First off, thanks for all your work!

I've been doing a lot of study recently and have a question that I can't seem to find a clear answer to, so I was wondering if you could help. In your view, what is the biography of Muhammad most widely accepted among Muslims? I've seen a lot of criticisms of Ibn Ishaq/Ibn Hisham's work, so I was wondering what else exists that might be more accepted. Any help is appreciated. Thanks!

mat said...


The more the non-Muslims( Christians specifically )lie/slander against prophet Muhammad( pbuh ), the more and more non-Muslims will enter ISLAM, the only one true religion on earth where the entering to ISLAM is taking place now.

Compelled prayer warrior for hostages of Islam said...

Ya habibi...here we go. Ya amm mat...eshah...

Unknown said...

Mat, I guess the truth hurts? The Bible says, the Truth shall set you free...

Anonymous said...

Mat, please argue with logic and based-on-data arguments. That's how things work