Friday, November 28, 2014

Pakistan Sentences Bollywood Actress Veena Malik to 26 Years in Prison for Blasphemy

Politicians and the media continue to defend Islam from criticism. Meanwhile, Pakistani courts are sentencing actors to prison for blasphemy. Any idea how Veena Malik will be treated in prison?
Veena Malik
Fox News—An actress was sentenced to 26 years in jail by a Pakistani anti-terrorism court for "malicious acts" of blasphemy, the U.K.s' Independent reports.

Veena Malik, along with her husband Asad Bashir Khan Khattak and Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman, the owner of the network that aired the "blasphemous" television program, have been given 104 years combined in prison by the Pakistani court.

The offending program aired several months ago and features a couple reenacting their wedding vows based on the marriage of the Prophet Mohammed's daughter.

The judge asked for immediate arrest of Malik, her husband and Shakil-ur-Rahman who are reportedly living in the United Arab Emirates.

"26 years! Come on. 26 years is a lifetime...But I have faith in higher courts in Pakistan," Malik said according to Gulf News. (Continue Reading.)

18 comments:

Osama Abdallah said...

"Pakistan Sentences Bollywood Actress Veena Malik to 26 Years in Prison for Blasphemy "

That is not true. It was a small court in Kashmir that sentenced here, and it is controlled by India:

"The court order will be enforced in the Pakistan-controlled city of Gilgit, which is also part of the India-claimed Kashmir regions."

Visit:

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/veena-malik-sentenced-to-26-years-in-jail-for-blasphemy-after-appearing-in-mock-tv-wedding-scene-9884985.html

Osama Abdallah
www.answering-christianity.com

chris J said...

Gligit is part of Pakistan controlled area.

bob morane said...

i even know a country where guys are condamned to death, waited during 40 years to get killed, just because he was black....

D335 said...

Osama Abdallah :
That is not true. It was a small court in Kashmir that sentenced here, and it is controlled by India:

WHICH QUOTE IS THIS? I can't find it in the article.
"The court order will be enforced in the Pakistan-controlled city of Gilgit, which is also part of the India-claimed Kashmir regions."


FACT:
UN intervention of the Kashmir conflict, 31 December 1948, left PAKISTAN with roughly two-fifths of Kashmir along with Gilgit and Baltistan,
leaving three-fifths of Kashmir along with Jammu and Leh to INDIA.

conclusion: DEAD WRONG

Davy Jones said...

Osama said - That is not true. It was a small court in Kashmir that sentenced here, and it is controlled by India

Osama you have an iq of a carrot

paki p said...

@osama
My brother in humanity, please please verify what you write or comment before you comment. Anti-terrorism court of Pakistan is, well a court in Pakistan NOT India. Gilgit and baltistan region is IN Pakistan not India. As a matter of fact it was a tourist destination and very popular one at that until that very "tiny" minority of the peace loving religion messed it up.And the author of the link that you provided is as misinformed as you are. And please don't even try to tell me otherwise, I live in Pakistan.

smalltallest88 said...

@Osama

I never knew you love to flaunt your ignorant almost all the time.

Sometimes I wonder if you do get the message. Weather it's Pakistan as it is or India as you want us to believe, the bottom line here is sending some to prison for 26 years for Blasphemy. Is Muhammad now a god?

Why do people need to fight for Muhammad? Don't tell me you guys have turn Muhammad to a god that you worship. Because the only being that can be blaspheme is God.

Martin Vink said...

Is Islam a legal entity under the law?

On what basis was Islam incorporated and on what basis do its organisations apply for tax exempt status?

Perhaps incorporation and tax authorities should review on what basis the Incorporation and the Tax Status was approved?

They need to examine whether a religion or a charity that is based on the Koran and supporting doctrinal material be legitimate, considering the following:

1. That the Koran proscribes to and Islam engages in the beheading of those it calls Kafir and those it deems have either profaned Islam or have committed blasphemy.

2. That the Koran proscribes an Islam engages in murder.

3. That the Koran proscribes and Islam engages in torture and maiming of people as a punishment.

4. That the Koran proscribes and Islam engages in slavery.

5. That the Koran proscribes and Islam engages in rape.

6. That the Koran proscribes and Islam engages in theft.

7. That Islam engages in female genital mutilation.

8. That Islam disadvantages females by demanding restrictions in education, behaviour and dress code.

Has a judgement on each of these issues been made?

Those appear to be fundamental questions to protect our society, religious freedom and freedom of expression.

Nojmul Huda said...

@ Martin,

You are right, Islam has all criteria to declare it a religion of anti-human antihuman right political party that directly encourage to kill non-Muslims as per their religious SHARIA LAWS and Qur’anic teaching without any doubt. It should not get registration as a religion and should not get any benefit as 501C tax exam non-profit organization.

Davy Jones said...

Professor Wood..I know this is off topic but I know of no other way to contact you..As far as I know to be a muslim, one has to say the shahada and I have silenced countless of muslim when they say that Jesus was a muslim and when I say where did He say the shahada in the quran and I always get a no response because He never said the shahada !! Now here is a muslim lady who said that Jesus said the shahada and it is in the Bible..!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjTGv8cQLnk

Please do your thing...and by the way I had no idea you could beatbox...wicked !!

Davy Jones said...

Professor Wood..I know this is off topic but I know of no other way to contact you..As far as I know to be a muslim, one has to say the shahada and I have silenced countless of muslim when they say that Jesus was a muslim and when I say where did He say the shahada in the quran and I always get a no response because He never said the shahada !! Now here is a muslim lady who said that Jesus said the shahada and it is in the Bible..!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rjTGv8cQLnk

Please do your thing...and by the way I had no idea you could beatbox...wicked !!

Nojmul Huda said...

@Davy Jones,

Muslims have no other choice but to believe those Qur’anic characters which were incorporated from the Bible such as Adam, Noah, Abraham, Jesus, John the Baptist etc. were Muslims, even though Muhammad was born 6 hundred years after our Lord Jesus Christ’s incarnation into this world.

Though Muslim prophet Muhammad was illiterate, but he had common sense that he would face many criticisms if he doesn’t tell people they were Muslims. Muslims also believe that Muhammad were with their Allah even before creation of this Universe as we Christian believe the Word (Jesus) was with the God according to Gospel John and every things were created by Him.

But interestingly Muslims also believe that Muhammad is not with their Allah now after his death by poison. And they (Muslims) pray every day to their Allah so that their Allah takes Muhammad into heaven as their Allah promised and later all Muslims could come to heaven because of Muhammad, who is their savior.

Muslims be aware! There is no guarantee that all Muslims will be in heaven, unless Muhammad be in heaven first.

“Empty vessel sounds much”. Muslims protect their religion by terrorizing people so that existing Muslims do not leave and bring new people into their flock by threating to kill if non-Muslims convert to Islam. What a terrible/horrible religion!!!

BOOTA SINGH said...

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2b7zlp_bibi-aisha-r-a-ki-extreme-gustakhi-by-junaid-jamshed_news

BOOTA SINGH said...

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x2bigqd_6-junaid-jamshed_news
David, please follow this news, i wish he should be hang to death blasphemy Law 295c Pakistan.

IslamSINS said...

One item of info piqued my curiosity:

"The offending program aired several months ago and features a couple reenacting their wedding vows based on the marriage of the Prophet Mohammed's daughter."

Why would such a reenactment result in a scolding, much less a trial? Was it such a filthy ceremony that the marriage was consummated on the spot, in front of witnesses? Is this just more "victimization" sniveling by Muhammad's herd?

If Muhammad's daughter followed Islam, what was so wrong about her wedding vows to evoke such harsh penalties for this reenactment? Where can I read to learn what caused such condemnation of this emulation?

IslamSINS said...

This is what I found in answer to my question in the previous comment from Time.com:

"The offending scene was a reenactment of Malik and Khan’s own wedding, acted as musicians played a devotional song about the wedding of a daughter of the Prophet Muhammad. After the episode aired, the senior vice president of a chapter of the Muslim religious organisation Ahle Sunnat Wal Jamaat made an official complaint, saying the show had defiled the family of the Prophet Muhammad, by using the religious music."

What brain dead dweebs are the Muslims.

Dacritic said...

Hey Davy, good to see you again. I suppose David is preparing for his upcoming debates. Muslims and JW's like to use parts of the Bible to deny the deity of Christ. She quotes Matthew on God calling Jesus a servant, but yet, in the same book, God also called Jesus Son and Jesus called God his Father. Also, the issue she is raising about Jesus not being God has seen so many debates involving David and the team here. Here is Sam's article:

http://www.answering-islam.org/Shamoun/q_john17_3.htm

Davy Jones said...

Dacritic...How ya doin buddy? I agree with you but it is so sad to watch how Muslims could be so blind to the facts...


Nojmul Huda...spot on