Saturday, September 28, 2013

The Nairobi Mall Massacre

Western leaders and the media assure us that the recent terrorist attack at Westgate Mall in Nairobi, Kenya has nothing to do with Islam, and that, by killing unbelievers, the terrorist group al-Shabaab is violating the commands of Allah and Muhammad. But what happens when we open the Qur'an to see what it teaches? We find that Islamic history has been repeating itself for fourteen centuries.


Mark Berlinger said...

Thank you David Wood for speaking so knowledgeably and succinctly on a subject where so many Christians and Muslim sympathizers are so deliberately and blatantly clueless.

bam bamba said...

David, 81 people were recently killed in a church in Pakistan and 67 in Nairobi and hundreds of other killings by followers of Mohammed whose religion of "peace" happens to be islam. This does not have anything to do with Islam? What else do these morons need to convince them that it is islam and nothing else. Could it be that David Cameron, Obama and their liberal followers are on the payroll of Saudi Arabia. My heart is pained every time I see the slaughter of the innocents, to hear that it has nothing to do with Islam. We are living in dangerous days indeed.
Thank you David for shining the light of the truth into our dark dark world.

G.A.P. said...

Does anyone else find the very logic of these Islamist attacks almost as appalling as the acts themselves? There are these conflicts that they join solely because it happens that Muslims are the victims, often only incidentally (i.e. it's not because they're Muslims), and other conflicts around the world get much less attention because the victims are unfortunate enough to be non-Muslim and therefore there is no global terrorist organization/militia to go out and fight and kill on their behalf.

I'm usually not clear on expressing these concepts without presenting some examples.

The United States, both the government and its people, has been fueling a massive drug war in Mexico that has resulted in the deaths of tens of thousands and the displacement of over 1.5 million Mexicans. Mexico is mostly Catholic. There are no global Catholic terrorist organizations targeting random non-Catholics, accusing the entire world of an anti-Catholic conspiracy or a "War on Catholicism".

A much, much better, more telling example: There is a little place called West Papua that has been been occupied by Indonesia since the 1960s. Indonesian forces have killed hundreds of thousands of native Papuans, colonized the land with Indonesian migrants, and stolen natural resources. Some say there is a genocide being committed against native Papuans. Now think about this: this is almost exactly like Palestine. Some supporters of Papuan independence even attempted a Freedom Flotilla to West Papua (which failed, I believe). What is the difference between Palestine and West Papua? Why does the world demand freedom for Palestine but doesn't even know about West Papua? Well, in the case of Palestine, Jews are aggressors against Muslims. Al-Qaeda makes sure everyone knows--targeting innocent Jews and Westerners because of the suffering of their coreligionists. But the native West Papuans are Christians/traditional practitioners who are oppressed and occupied by Muslims. There is no global Christian militia that terrorizes the entire world on behalf of their coreligionists. Thus, no one cares.

So the reason everyone, including the unfortunate shoppers in Kenya, has to suffer for Somalia but no one has to suffer for South Sudan and Darfur (except for the animists, Christians, and Muslim non-Arabs in those regions, of course!) is because they are not Muslim (or the right kind of Muslim). The suffering of Muslims is the only suffering that matters, according to al-Qaeda and its affiliates, and when Muslims suffer, everyone has to be punished.

This is bigotry, stupidity, just plain double standards with disastrous results. I mean, if everybody followed this logic ("my coreligionists are suffering, kill all infidels"), the entire world would just explode. Christians would have to start a new Crusade not only for Christians in the Islamic world persecuted for their faith but also Christians who were victims of conflicts for reasons completely unrelated to their faith. We would have to be killing every non-Christian in sight for Mexico, West Papua, South Sudan, maybe even northern Cyprus. Seriously, that would be the result if there were a Christian equivalent to al-Qaeda. It sounds ridiculous because it is.

Alert said...

'Nairobi massacre explained for Dummies'!
Thank you David!

Haecceitas said...

2:53-3:02 in the video, Obama says:
"And I consider it as a PART OF MY RESPONSIBILITY as president of the United States TO FIGHT against negative stereotypes of Islam WHEREVER THEY APPEAR".

This is probably just a coincidence but it's curious how this statement sounds a bit like a combination of these two:

"I HAVE BEEN ORDERED TO FIGHT the people till they say: La ilaha illallah." (Sahih al-Bukhari 6924)

"When the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters WHEREVER YOU FIND THEM." (Surah 9:5)

Radical Moderate said...

"Shopping while non Muslim" classic line

Deleting said...

David said in the video "They are marshmallow where their vertebrae should be..."

And musty old cotton fluff where there should be a brain.

Prasanna said...

The continuous actions in Iraq, Syria and Afghanistan, and recent ones in Pakistan and Nairobi by the Islamists/Jihadhists are a clear proof that these thugs are but the 'slaves of Satan!'

S. N. Smith said...


WhatsUpDoc said...

Great video. Cameron says " they do it based on their WARPED world view"LOL. Mohammad's world view Dar ul Islam and Dar ul Haraab is perfectly normal world view, isn't it Mr Cameron and Mr Obama??? LOL

larry said...


New post on

How the Jews set up the pedophile Saudi state as Israel’s proxy in the Middle East
by Simon Gibson


Zbigniew Brzezinski: Evil Spirit of 5 US Presidents – And Biggest Threat to World Peace
(by Anders, from Euro-Med Website) There is a man who is more dangerous to mankind than any other living person today. His name is Zbigniew Brzezinski, a CFR-member , Arch-Trilateral Commissionist, Bilderberger. He has been the evil spirit behind 5 US presidents, including Obama – and he is obsessed with but one thought: The US is to dominate a communist one world state.

For that purpose, he sees Eurasia as his grand chessboard, where the battle is to be won. Like any chess player, he starts by occupying the centre of the chessboard, Central Asia.

He wants peace there, friendly arrangements, in particular with China, if possible, so that he can pursue the goal of his obsession, i.e. the purpose of the Trilateral Commission created by him and David Rockefeller: To create a world state by fusing a coming North American Union, at which he is working through the CSIS, the Union for the Mediterranean – and a Far East block which is now being created.



By Dennis L. Cuddy, Ph.D.
June 27, 2011

Power Elite (PE) agent Lord Herbert Samuel (Jew) was one of the first to refer to the establishment of a “new world order” (House of Lords, May 16 and August 7, 1918). As a member of the Milner Group that controlled British foreign affairs from the beginning of the 20th century until WWII, Samuel in 1921 appointed Hajj Amin al-Husseini as Mufti and head political administrator of Arab Palestine. Lord Alfred Milner, who was in charge of executing PE member Cecil Rhodes’ secret “scheme to take the government of the whole world,” on June 27, 1923 in the House of Lords said regarding Palestine that there “must always remain not an Arab country or a Jewish country, but… an international country in which all the world has a special interest—I think some Mandatory Power will always be required.”

Deleting said...

@ Larry so basically you're an anti-semite new world order bilderburger conspiratorialist.....

don't think we've ever had one of those on the board before.

Stephen Powell said...

The West is utterly devoid of great men in politics. We have clowns, stuffed shirts and deliberate con-artists with hidden agendas. But great men? No.

Gary Fouse said...

David Cameron may just be the last prime minister of Great Britain. If so, I hope he turns off the lights as he goes out.

Somewhere Neville Chamberlain is smiling.

Baron Eddie said...

What the Prime Minister thinks he is a good politician and he is serving the public but he is doing it for the name of vain philosophy and benefits ...

I did know that the Prime Minister can issue a Fatwa!

Steve41oo said...

I agree Cameron and Obama (and Blair and Bush) sound stupid when they insist Islamist Jihadist terrorists have nothing to do with Islam. They are desperate to cling to this lie because they can't face the truth. The USA/UK encouraged Islamist terror groups to fight the Soviets, and now they're fighting us in the mother of all blow backs. And they are most certainly doing it in the name of Allah and the global caliphate. Thanks Zbigniew Brzezinski.

ignatius said...

David, I remember a remark of Hirsi Ali in one of her books from a few years back which may provide an explanation for the lies and cravenness of our top politicians. Jihadis continually tell young Moslems that the west is waging a war against them, trying to destroy their religion. In the eyes of the political elite, the worst thing politicians could do would be to say something which confirms this claim. If they said anything which could be construed as Islam being a problem, even if they only indirectly say it, using words like Islamists, Islamic fundamentalists, and the like, then their words could be used as propaganda for more jihadi recruitment. If a western leader even hinted that Islam was the problem, thereby implying that we had to suppress, neuter or destroy their religion, then maybe 10s of 1000s of additional young men would take up the grand jihad against the west.

One could thus regard these slimy speeches and interviews as being the lesser of two evils. (I admit, however, that this explanation may be inadequate to explain Obama's statements.)

I cannot suggest a political solution to this dilemma. Leading souls to Christ is far more productive than political solutions anyhow. It brings salvation to those who don’t know Christ, and it deals with the core of the problem of Islam, which is certainly spiritual.