Thursday, March 22, 2012

French Muslim Mohammed Merah Dead after Standoff with Police

The media, of course, are busy reminding us that Merah's hatred for Jews had nothing to do with Islam, as if we're all still hopelessly ignorant of Muhammad's teachings:

Sahih al-Bukhari 2926--Narrated Abu Hurairah: Allah's Messenger said, "The Hour will not be established until you fight against the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say, 'O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.'"

I think we may have entered a new phase of Islamic terrorism here in the West. Over the past decade, jihadists have been remarkably stupid. They decide to slaughter the kufar, but in order to carry out their plan, they start walking around, asking where they can get some bombs. At that point, the FBI enters the picture, gives them some fake bombs, and puts them in jail.

After every failed terrorist attack in recent years, I always thought to myself, "Wow, I'm glad these idiots don't realize they can just get a gun and start shooting people." But now it's happened. A jihadist who keeps quiet, plans his attack, and carries it out before drawing attention to himself is much more dangerous than the typical "mob mentality" jihadist who finds strength in numbers.

Lots of young jihadists are looking at Merah's work right now and thinking, "So that's how it's done!"


FRANCE--The Al Qaeda fanatic who murdered seven people in south west France filmed all of his killings in their entirety, it has been confirmed.

Prosecutor Francois Molins had the grim task of watching Mohammed Merah's recordings.

In one, he is seen holding a gun to a victims head and saying: 'You killed my brothers, I kill you.'

It came as Jund al-Khilafah, an Al-Qaeda splinter group, claimed responsibility for Merah's crimes in an online statement.

In the end, he too died of a shot in the head, sustained in a vicious gun battle when police stormed his apartment following a 32-hour siege.

The Toulouse terrorist burst out of his flat's bathroom 'shooting insanely' at officers, before leaping to his death from a window.

In scenes reminiscent of a Hollywood film, Mohammad Merah, 23, unleashed round after round from automatic weapons after gas cannisters were thrown into his apartment and police stormed in.

Two officers were injured, including one who is still in a serious condition.

Interior Minister Claude Gueant said: 'We sent in special cameras to be able to see where he was but we could not find him. It was when we were able to locate him in the bathroom that he came out shooting madly at everybody.

'The police had never seen anything like this kind of violence and the RAID police had to protect themselves.

'Merah jumped out of the window and continued to shoot. He was found dead on the ground.'

Merah, who admits murdering seven people in the past week, had been holed up in his flat in the city of Toulouse with a variety of weapons since 3am yesterday.

Police decided to move in after negotiations broke down and he threatened to start killing officers. (Read more.)

To understand jihad, be sure to watch this video:

23 comments:

Kangaroo said...

In order to understand Jihad, we must look at it from good sources.
These sources tell us that killing innocent children is a great sin.
These sources tell us that being a vigilante is a great sin.
These sources tell us killing an innocent peaceful noncombatant is a great sin.
These sources tell us that David Wood is wrong.

Radical Moderate said...

Kangaroo what sources tell you this?

What are these "Good sources"?

Hezekiah Ahaz said...

Of course, kangaroo, you can Just ignore what your prophet commanded you to do but here it is again just in case you missed it:

"The Hour will not be established until you fight against the Jews, and the stone behind which a Jew will be hiding will say, 'O Muslim! There is a Jew hiding behind me, so kill him.'"


But we all know how you feel about him anyway so it's no surprise you are ignoring his commands.

Andish said...

Islam was, is, and will always be a violence supported backwards religion. Islam will be defeated.

Deleting said...

Roo said, "In order to understand Jihad, we must look at it from good sources.
These sources tell us that killing innocent children is a great sin.
These sources tell us that being a vigilante is a great sin.
These sources tell us killing an innocent peaceful noncombatant is a great sin...."

These 'good sources' were abrogated according to your most trusted islamic scholars like Al-tabari, Ishaq, Quertabi and Ibn Kathir.

Search 4 Truth said...

Kangaroo. I guess it all depends on what a Muslim wants to accept as reliable a source!

Everyone becomes a combatant in the eyes of Islam if they reject Islam or it's superiority! Hence all non Muslims are inferior and can be treated as such!

So who did Mohamed say to fight and whose life and property are sacred?

According to your sole Prophet! Only Muslims!

Narrated Anas bin Malik:
Allah's Apostle said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah." Narrated Maimun ibn Siyah that he asked Anas bin Malik,
"O Abu Hamza! What makes the life and property of a person sacred?" He replied, "Whoever says, 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah', faces our Qibla during the prayers, prays like us and eats our slaughtered animal, then he is a Muslim, and has got the same rights and obligations as other Muslims have."
Sahih Bukhari 1:8:387 , See also: Sahih Bukhari 1:2:24

So are you lying, or is Mohamed?

Further!

A non Muslims life is not equal to a non believers!

I asked 'Ali "Do you have anything Divine literature besides what is in the Qur'an?" Or, as Uyaina once said, "Apart from what the people have?" 'Ali said, "By Him Who made the grain split (germinate) and created the soul, we have nothing except what is in the Quran and the ability (gift) of understanding Allah's Book which He may endow a man, with and what is written in this sheet of paper." I asked, "What is on this paper?" He replied, "The legal regulations of Diya (Blood-money) and the (ransom for) releasing of the captives, and the judgment that no Muslim should be killed in Qisas (equality in punishment) for killing a Kafir (disbeliever)."
Sahih Bukhari 9:83:50 , See also: Sahih Bukhari 1:3:111 , and Sahih Bukhari 4:52:283

Search 4 Truth said...

Is this consistent with Islam? Of course it is!

02.178 O ye who believe! the law of equality is prescribed to you in cases of murder: the free for the free, the slave for the slave, the woman for the woman. But if any remission is made by the brother of the slain, then grant any reasonable demand, and compensate him with handsome gratitude, this is a concession and a Mercy from your Lord. After this whoever exceeds the limits shall be in grave penalty.



* تفسير Tafsir al-Jalalayn
{ يٰأَيُّهَا ٱلَّذِينَ آمَنُواْ كُتِبَ عَلَيْكُمُ ٱلْقِصَاصُ فِي ٱلْقَتْلَى ٱلْحُرُّ بِالْحُرِّ وَٱلْعَبْدُ بِٱلْعَبْدِ وَٱلأُنثَىٰ بِٱلأُنْثَىٰ فَمَنْ عُفِيَ لَهُ مِنْ أَخِيهِ شَيْءٌ فَٱتِّبَاعٌ بِٱلْمَعْرُوفِ وَأَدَآءٌ إِلَيْهِ بِإِحْسَانٍ ذٰلِكَ تَخْفِيفٌ مِّن رَّبِّكُمْ وَرَحْمَةٌ فَمَنِ ٱعْتَدَىٰ بَعْدَ ذٰلِكَ فَلَهُ عَذَابٌ أَلِيمٌ }

O you who believe, prescribed, made obligatory, for you is retaliation, on equal terms, regarding the slain, both in the attributes [of the one slain] and in the action involved; a free man, is killed, for a free man, and not for a slave; and a slave for a slave, and a female for a female. The Sunna makes it clear that a male may be killed [in retaliation] for a female, and that religious affiliation should be taken into account also, so that a Muslim cannot be killed in return for an disbeliever, even if the former be a slave and the latter a free man.

So are kafres innocent by denying your pervert monster Prophet and Pimp Allah? Not according to Mohamed and Allah! They are guilty for denying Allah and are not equal in this life or the life after!

Ye are the best of peoples, evolved for mankind, enjoining what is right, forbidding what is wrong, and believing in Allah. If only the People of the Book [Christians and Jews] had faith, it were best for them: among them are some who have faith, but most of them are perverted transgressors. (3:110)

Are the worst of creatures equal to the best?

Those who reject (Truth), among the People of the Book and among the Polytheists, will be in Hell-Fire, to dwell therein (for aye). They are the worst of creatures. (98:6)


Now what reliable sources were you speaking of?

The Islam that you wish existed is a figment of your imagination.

And I will sit back and watch how you argue with Allah and Mohamed.

because remember, I didnt write this stuff. And I reject it! But you are commanded to follow it! But I am sure you are more loyal to your own humanity than you are to Allah. Or else you would be doing exactly what this piece of filth did!

Wake up! It's time for the neurons to kick in any day now!

Billy said...

Kangaroo, you say, “David Wood is wrong”, but the Islamic radicals disagree with you. Thy are using “good sources” to support (a) killing innocent children, (b) being vigilantes, (c) killing innocent peaceful noncombatants.

Kangaroo, Islam is in dire need of reformation. Moderate Muslims are afraid to speak out against the radical ones. Why don’t you take it upon yourself to educate your misguided brothers—the Islamic terrorists—that their actions are wicked and sinful and report back to us--that is, if you manage to stay alive.

Hezekiah Ahaz said...

Remember when Kangaroo emailed that Imam about the sun setting in a pool.

I really enjoyed the answer he got:

It's ok Kangaroo muhammad was wrong but don't worry that doesn't take anything away from his prophethood.

Classic.

Kangaroo said...

Pathetic how you have no knowledge about what you're quoting whatsoever.

Ill gladly post what i mean tomorrow. Goodnight for now ;)

aussie christian said...

Shall wait to see if the moozlims find his death as an excuse to riot. Hoping that they realise he is not worth rioting over, but not holding my breath, fully expecting, going on their past reactions to see violence increase in the wake of this, but its Friday, so we shall see.

Davidsmountain .^. said...

Ironic those 2 French soldiers Mohammed shot were Muslim. Say, where are all the Muslim uprisings around the world, over the moderate martyrs?? Surely, this horror of humanity rises above the burning of a book!

Where's all the outrage in the streets, the threats, violence and calls for revenge?? Guess it's ok if a Muslim kills a Muslim or anyone else, for that matter. A Muslim must NEVER criticize Islam or jihad. A 14 century evil legacy of Islamic jihad once again proves, somethings never change! Muslims have so much to be proud of these days!

simple_truth said...

Kangaroo said...

" Pathetic how you have no knowledge about what you're quoting whatsoever.

Ill gladly post what i mean tomorrow. Goodnight for now ;)"

Of course, you would say such a thing. What else could you say without disagreeing with us?

Jihad's classical definition is about war/fighting and not the inner struggle that you are probably going to try to show us. Surah 9 illustrates this perfectly.

Killing innocents is subjective and depends upon your definition. In Islam, a person who does not endorse Islam is not innocent. Even those bystanders who are in the midst of a Islamic target for destruction aren't innocent. Muslims can kill them in order to achieve their mission(s). So, vigilante is not really the real issue in my observation.

Davis is wrong by whose account? Yours? Let's see your evidence and discuss.

D335 said...

Kangaroo pants on fire :p

The facts, the history, the scriptures, everything is against you :P - muhammedan brainwashed ummah!

will you keep vomiting lies ?


Muhammad was the early blackwater mercenary corporation of our day. Kill, kill kill and Muhammad expected more sex, sex and sex. He was under the control of blackmagic, and he acts like one!

And 1400 years later,lol... another muhammad wannabe - Kangaroo :p

mikeyh428 said...

I love this French official's statement in response: "We must not mix religious fundamentalism and terrorism, even if naturally we well know the links that unite the two." Can one say 'out of touch with reality?' This guy was in Afghanistan running a bomb factory, kidnapped someone, attended Al-Qaeda training camps, went on a sword waving rampage screaming Al-Qaeda, was on no-fly and watch lists - and French authorities "'at no moment' suspected Merah would be dangerous, despite a long criminal record." Amazing.

Kangaroo said...

http://answering-christianity.com/bassam_zawadi/did_prophet_muhammad_kill_innocents.htm

Kangaroo said...

Yes the Muslims will be fighting the Jews in the end. They will believe their Messiah has come, but that Messiah is truly the AntiChrist and the Muslims will destroy his army after Isa (Jesus) kills him. Thats what the Hadith is referring to.

Killing innocents was never abrogated.
http://answering-christianity.com/bassam_zawadi/did_prophet_muhammad_kill_innocents.htm


The sources are use do not include Ibn Ishaq or Tabari because much of those hadith are not authentic, have weak or no narrators. I use Bukhari and Muslim and the Quran.
As for the hadith about qisas it is weak and the only one that says such a thing.
http://www.islamawareness.net/FAQ/faq1001.html

Kangaroo said...

Here is a beautiful story about the Prophet Muhammad tolerating peace:

 And in a narration of Abu Bakr Al-Isma`ili, the polytheist asked: "Who will protect you from me?'' Messenger of Allah (PBUH) replied, "Allah.'' As soon as he said this, the sword fell down from his hand and Messenger of Allah (PBUH) catching the sword, asked him, "Who will protect you from me.'' He said, "Please forgive me.'' Messenger of Allah (PBUH) said, "On condition you testify that there is none worthy of worship but Allah and that I am His Messenger.'' He said, "No, but I promise you that I shall not fight against you, nor shall I be with those who fight with you". The Prophet (PBUH) let him go. He then went back to his companions and said: "I have come to you from one of the best of mankind".



 78. Jabir (May Allah be pleased with him) reported: I went in an expedition along with the Prophet (PBUH) in the direction of  Najd. When Messenger of Allah (PBUH) returned, I also returned with him. Then the mid-day sleep overtook us in a valley full of prickly shrubs. Messenger of Allah (PBUH) got down and the people scattered around seeking shade under the trees. Messenger of Allah (PBUH) hang up his sword on the branch of a tree. We were enjoying a sleep when Messenger of Allah (PBUH) called us, and lo! There was a desert Arab bedouin near him. He (PBUH) said, "This man brandished my sword over me while I was asleep. I woke up and saw it in his hand unsheathed. He asked: `Who will protect you from me?' I replied: 'Allah' - thrice". He did not punish him and sat down. [Al-Bukhari and Muslim].

Kangaroo said...

The wealth that he steals from them is haraam. It was narrated that al-Mugheerah ibn Shu’bah kept company with some people during the Jaahiliyyah. He killed them and took their wealth, then he came and entered Islam. The Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) said: “As for your Islam, I accept it, and as for the wealth, I have nothing to do with it.” According to a report narrated by Abu Dawood, “As for your Islam, we accept it, and as for the wealth it is obtained through treachery, and we have no need of it.”

(Narrated by al-Bukhaari, 2583; Abu Dawood, 2765; classed as saheeh by al-Albaani in Saheeh Abi Dawood, 2403)

Al-Haafiz Ibn Hajar said:

The phrase “and as for the wealth, I have nothing to do with it” means, I will not touch it because it was obtained through treachery. What we learn from this is that it is not permissible to take the wealth of the kuffaar [non-Muslims] by treachery when they have trusted you and granted you safety, because when people accompany one another (when travelling), they do so on the basis of mutual trust, and that trust should not be betrayed, whether the other person is a Muslim or a kaafir…

http://spencerwatch.com/2010/08/15/silencing-spencer-taqiyya-and-kitman-are-part-of-judeo-christian-belief/#refF3

cornholio said...

@Kangarootistan

Um, what did you holey prophet do to the Jews who lived in the Soddy Barbarian peninsula again? Kill them, enslave them, deport them and steal all their possessions. Yeah, that's your prophet, the man of peace, the peace of the grave that is, at least for kufars.

Kangaroo said...

@ corneliusthejew
What did the Jews do?
Commit treason? No? What is the punishment for treason in any society? Oh you can guess it starts with "D".

Deleting said...

Kangaroo,

If I've never said the Shahada am I an innocent?

If I refuse to take shahadah and hold onto my christian faith and proclaim the name of Jesus to non-muslims, am I an innocent?

Deleting said...

No response from roo....what a surprise.