Seems like you're using the Bible to defeat the Muslim's belief in the "swoon theory." Wouldn't a Muslim just say that the Bible is corrupt and not to be trusted or believed?
Thank you for the video, Mr. Jonathan. But my worry is how to get past the blanket claim that Jews and Christians have corrupted all Scripture and therefore nothing from them can be trusted, save what is in the Quran. And if one was to refute such a claim by pointing out that the Quran directs Muslims to confirm its ayats in the Torah and Injeel, which have not changed since the time they were penned down, still the aforementioned blanket claim is used in reply with the slight modification that Scripture was corrupted (or further corrupted) shortly after the death of Mohammed. It really is a frustrating farce but that's how Muslims "win" arguments and refuse to allow reason be heard above their yells of "Corrupted! Corrupted!" Is there any way to get around this claim? Because if we can then many proofs for Christ will be irrefutable and impervious to the "claim of corruption".Thanks, again, for all your hard work.
Thank you so much Jonathan. Excellent and clear explanation for refuting the comments on Jesus Christ's crucifixion.
Yes Muslims can use the. Straw man argument That the old and New Testament are corrupt But you have proof that this is not the case the Quran Is judged by the New Testament not the other way around since the New Testament Came over 600 yrs before the Quran and before the religion Of Islam was even started and also you can point out the verse Not sure where in the Quran but it states only allah can change the words In his writings so if Muslims accept that Allah wrote the Old Testament For the Jews and the New Testament for the Christians and onlyHe has the power to change them then no the excuse of corruptionOf these two scriptures is a false claim that Muslims make
Post a Comment