Saturday, August 31, 2013

Muslim Social Services Worker Jailed for Trying to Derail Rape-Gang Trial

If someone I knew were guilty of abusing a little girl, I can't imagine myself obstructing justice in an attempt to derail the case. But when a girl came forward against Mohammed Imran Amjad and several other Muslim men, four members of the local Muslim community (one of whom was a social services worker) sprang into action . . . to protect Amjad and others from prosecution.

BBC News—A woman who worked in social services has been jailed for attempting to derail a grooming trial.

Receptionist Mahdiya Khan accessed a computer database 60 times to get details of a child sex victim.

She was jailed for eight months, but details have only just emerged. Three men have also been found guilty of interfering in the case.

Mohammed Imran Amjad, 26, was earlier jailed for four years and three months after he admitted abusing a child.

Five others were cleared of rape, sexual assault and child abduction at Burnley Crown Court in April.

Detectives realised Amjad's girlfriend, Mahdiya Khan, had tried to undermine the case. She was a receptionist working for Lancashire County Council social services in Burnley.

They found she accessed a confidential database 60 times over 15 days to find details of the witness and her family.

The county council said she was immediately suspended and dismissed.

A spokesman said: "When this security breach came to light, the advice from our data protection team was that no further practical steps could have been taken to prevent it from having occurred."

Three other people connected to Amjad had also attempted to interfere with the case.

His cousin Waqas Khalid threatened to rape the victim and her mother. His friend Qasim Hussain persuaded her to change her statement. His brother, Furqan Amjad, contacted the victim 350 times.

Furqan Amjad was jailed for 15 months. Khalid was fined £300 and Hussain will be sentenced next week. (Continue Reading.)

12 comments:

Extremista Moderado said...

First a muslim police officer leaked plans to arrest Choudary. Now this? I think it's almost time to stick a fork in UK...

Deleting said...

Did I see it coming? No. Should I?

Sadly yes.

The mosques down here in NC where the terror cell member was arrested had members who, at the behest of the terrorist, tried to have the witness killed and beheaded.

Literally!!! They wanted this guy beheaded...

the religion of piece.....

Mary said...

It makes me want to ask if she was helping the men find victims in the first place.

They are all helping enforce Shariah law, which claims global jurisdiction (Mosques are legal centers wherein legal edicts are passed on to the ummah). Taysir is lifted when there are enough Muslims/Muslims in power to enforce Shariah, so it is then a requirement on all Muslims. Would these men be prosecuted under Shariah law for doing what Mohammad did? (Nope)

Tom ta tum Tom said...

Yet again, special access and privileges for Muslim "gatekeepers". The infiltrators... The "inside-job" enablers... and here?

Muslims at the State Department... Muslims in the Pentagon... Muslims influencing immigration policy... Muslims in the White-House. Muslims in the News Media... Muslims attempting to raise the profile of a "Muslim Friendly" translation of God's Only Holy Word...

Yes, I feel VERY bad for Great Britain - but Loosie, we got some 'SPLAININ' to do, right here in river-city.

"My friends, we've got TRAITORS (oh yeah, we've got traitors)"
"Right here in River City!! (right here in River City)"

"And they start with deceit and intend our DEFEAT and enslavement as FOOLS!"

And I'm trying to be funny - but the situation is NOT funny and if you're not already thinking about DEMANDING from every elected official their unequivocal support for our Constitution (as opposed to Sharia) prior to the next election, then please DO get busy and contact the people responsible for removing your local Muslim "gatekeepers" from their posts.

Of COURSE not every Muslim is evil but every true Muslim IS a slave to Allah (Allahu Ohynksmorr) and unless said Muslim is willing to risk being "not Muslim enough", then Sayyid Muslim WILL DO exactly as he or she is told by their Imam. NO TRUE MUSLIM can be loyal to our Constitution (versus Sharia) and they LIE when they take the Oath of Citizenship. How can we tell the difference? All Muslims are MUSLIMS!!

"I mean we've got TRAITORS (oh, man we've got traitors)"
"Right here in River City!! (From the heart of Windy City)"

" 'N They're here to brainwash our own Children in our SCHOOLS!!"
"[Our Children's Children....]"

Sam & Dave and all of ABN are doing all they can with their available resources.
But am I doing all I can do - every day?

NO HATRED FOR SLAVES OF ALLAHU OHYNKSMORR - NO TOLERANCE FOR SHARIA/ISLAM!
["We gotta keep those young ones moral after Ghusl"]

KAFIR AND PROUD!!

Rehana Ali said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Brigitte said...

@Rehana Ali
Islam has always welcomed sick criminals starting with most perfect child rapist enslaver torturer and mass-murderer muhammad may allah bless him with loads of fresh white-skinned virgins and little pearl-like boys!

Foolster41 said...

"No race nor religion accepts people like these ! "

Except religions that teach such things!

"The Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) sent a military expedition to Awtas on the occasion of the battle of Hunain. They met their enemy and fought with them. They defeated them and took them captives.
Some of the Companions of the Apostle of Allah (may peace be upon him) were reluctant to have intercourse with the female captives in the presence of their husbands who were unbelievers. So Allah, the Exalted, sent down the Qur’anic verse: (Sura 4:24) "And all married women (are forbidden) unto you save those (captives) whom your right hands possess." (Abu Dawud 2150, also Muslim 3433)" (Q. 4:24)

"We went out with Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him) on the expedition to the Bi'l-Mustaliq and took captive some excellent Arab women; and we desired them, for we were suffering from the absence of our wives, (but at the same time) we also desired ransom for them. So we decided to have sexual intercourse with them but by observing 'azl (Withdrawing the male sexual organ before emission of semen to avoid-conception). But we said: We are doing an act whereas Allah's Messenger is amongst us; why not ask him? So we asked Allah's Messenger (may peace be upon him), and he said: It does not matter" (Sahih Muslim 3371)

You either are 1.)lying knowing full well your religion, or 2.)are now apalled to learn such things and will leave Islam. Which is it?

parisclaims said...

8 months? Is that a joke?

leonore said...

This is their strength that they look after each other whether it is legal or not makes no difference.
When the night of the knives comes who do you think they will be looking after then? If they side with the kafirs they will be killed also.

pat said...

Islam is a conspiracy against civilization. Muslims conspire against host governments.

goethechosemercy said...

The manipulation, rape and enslavement of non-Muslims and non-Muslim women in particular is the heart and soul of Islam.
Islam is profane-- this is self-evident truth.

Foolster41 said...

Hmm. Maybe Rukiah agrees that Islam commands such things, because instead of refuting how those verses are being misquoted, he deleted his own post.