Saturday, January 26, 2013

I Plead "Muslim": Pedophile Adil Rashid Spared Prison Due to Islamic Upbringing

Apparently, if a man has sex with a little girl in the U.K., he can avoid prison by pleading "Muslim." Since Muslims (according to the court's ruling) are taught that women are "worthless," they can't be expected to understand Western laws that prohibit sex with little girls. 

Daily Mail--A muslim who raped a 13-year-old girl he groomed on Facebook has been spared a prison sentence after a judge heard he went to an Islamic faith school where he was taught that women are worthless.

Adil Rashid, 18, claimed he was not aware that it was illegal for him to have sex with the girl because his education left him ignorant of British law.

Yesterday Judge Michael Stokes handed Rashid a suspended sentence, saying: ‘Although chronologically 18, it is quite clear from the reports that you are very naive and immature when it comes to sexual matters.’

Earlier Nottingham Crown Court heard that such crimes usually result in a four to seven-year prison sentence.

But the judge said that because Rashid was ‘passive’ and ‘lacking assertiveness’, sending him to jail might cause him ‘more damage than good’.

Rashid, from Birmingham, admitted he had sex with the girl, saying he had been ‘tempted by her’ after they met online.

They initially exchanged messages on Facebook before sending texts and chatting on the phone over a two-month period.

They then met up in Nottingham, where Rashid had booked a room at a Premier Inn.

The girl told police they stayed at the hotel for two hours and had sex after Rashid went to the bathroom and emerged wearing a condom.

Rashid then returned home and went straight to a mosque to pray. He was arrested the following week after the girl confessed what had happened to a school friend, who informed one of her teachers.

He told police he knew the girl was 13 but said he was initially reluctant to have sex before relenting after being seduced. (Source)

25 comments:

Michael C said...

English law thrown under the bus - yet another instance of disgraceful Dhimmitude, betrayal of Britain's youth.

"Ignorance of the law is no excuse" is the long-standing principle of English Law.

The sentence should be appealed.


Reconnaissance said...

Like I always say:

if this want such a serious matter, it would be hilarious.

I agree that this kid is an imbecile however that shouldnt be used as an excuse to let him off easy.

His attorney is a scumbag.

I wonder what Derrick aka learn Koran thinks about this.




Ds said...

How can someone be let off the hook after going against law of land?if judge gives reason of his not knowing law of land but only islamic laws, does it not say that unmarried man involved in such an act should receive 100 lashings according to quran?

James Ault said...

It looks like the judges over in England are as liberally imbalanced as our judges and juries are here in the States. We let killers & evildoers go all the time.

Foolster41 said...

This is sick! Ignorance is NEVER an excuse! I hope the child's family sues the judge. He deserves to be removed.

apran said...

I would name the judge as dhimmi of the month, if s/he is not a muslim.
What a disgusting person the judge is.

bob said...

Muslim's should reject any teachings that say (either directly or by implication) that women are worthless, otherwise they are going against what God spoke through Moses in genesis 1:27

So God created man in his own image; in the image of God he created him (mankind); MALE and FEMALE he created them.

To look down on beings that are made in God's image is to look down on and disrespect the Almighty himself.

And as for some of these judges; for their own sake, they had better start doing the right thing:

The higher the office the greater the responsibility; judges and magistrates are given strong warning against being corrupt or weak in their verdicts...

“Woe to those judges who issue unrighteous decrees, and to the magistrates who cause unjust and oppressive decisions to be recorded, to rob the needy of justice, and to take what is right from the poor of my people, that widows may be their prey, and that they may rob the fatherless. What will you do in the day of punishment, and in the desolation which will come from afar? To whom will you flee for help?” Isaiah 10:1-3

...and that they are under the close observation of the Highest Judge, while performing the office ordained by him, and that they judge on his behalf as his representatives...

God stands in the assembly of the mighty; he judges among the gods (judges). How long will you judge unjustly, and show partiality to the wicked?
Defend the poor and fatherless; do justice to the afflicted and needy; deliver the poor and needy; free them from the hand of the wicked.
They (the judges) do not know, nor do they understand; they walk about in darkness; all the foundations (the principles on which rests the administration of justice) of the earth are unstable. Psalm 82

The basic duty of a government is to maintain administrative order and to uphold the law, and to uphold order, for the peace and wellbeing of the citizens by means of the authority and power invested in it by the Creator.

"Let every soul be subject to the governing authorities. For there is no authority except from God, and the authorities that exist are appointed by God.

Therefore whoever resists the authority [temporal government] resists the ordinance of God, and those who resist will bring judgement on themselves [for criminal behaviour].

For civil authorities are not a terror to good works [abiding by the law], but to evil [crime]. Do you want to be unafraid of the authority? Do what is good, and you will have praise from the same. For he is Gods servant to you for good. But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword (law enforcement) in vain; for he is God’s servant, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil.

Therefore you must be subject, not only because of wrath but also for conscience’s sake. For because of this you also pay taxes, for they are Gods ministers [public servants – judges, magistrates, police] attending continually to this very thing.
Render therefore to all their due; taxes to whom taxes are due, revenue to whom revenue, respect to whom respect." Romans 13:1-7.

Note: the above scriptures were in existence and operating long before the Koran and Islamic law, which only turned up in 600 A.D.

Foolster41 said...

but Bob, doncha know they must be corrupt because they contradict the Koran! What? they existed 200+ years before the Koran, which is where we get our modern bible, and thus must have existed at the time of Mohammad? Well then there must be the Zionist time travelers! That's the only logical explanation!

Joe Daniels said...

Too right! How can somebody be too naive to know that sex with a 13-year-old is illegal, but know to use a condom during sex?

Mary said...

Just plain submission to Shariah law! If he did not know it was against the law, he would not have spent two months grooming her online and on the phone, just like any other pedophile would do to set up the abuse of the vulnerable. He would not have been so indirect about it if he had thought it was legal.

In the U.S., ignorance of the law is NO defense. It is assumed that a reasonable person seeks to find out what the law is before acting.

Thorsten Kahlert said...

Is this even a true story? It's only been published by the Daily Mail. The Daily Mail...

bob said...

Foolster 41, I'm hearing you. The argument that the Bible is corrupted (because it contradicts the Koran) is brought to nothing by the Bible itself i.e. those who disobey God's comandments (the Ten in Exodus 20:3-17) which are neatly summarized in Matthew 22:37-40, will have Romans 13:4 to contend with.

But if you do evil, be afraid; for he does not bear the sword in vain; for he is God's minister, an avenger to execute wrath on him who practices evil (crime).

All of the above verses are straight-forward, logical and have no loopholes (Galatians 6:7); which renders any claims that the Bible is corrupted null and void.

gabriella oak said...

You guys are like sooooo bigoted...
This girl seduced poor unworldly Rachid. Even the judge said he lacked assertiveness, so what chance did he have against the feminine wiles of some oversexed 13 year old, eh?

And before anyone points out that it was he who booked a hotel room with nefarious intentions, I'm sure it was an entirely innocent action on his part. He probably just wanted some privacy so he could invite the silly little strumpet to Islam. He should be praised for taking time out of his busy day to help the slutty infidel. May Allah reward him with limitless concubines!

Deleting said...

Joe Daniel asked, "Too right! How can somebody be too naive to know that sex with a 13-year-old is illegal, but know to use a condom during sex?"

Me-Someone who has done it before????

Foolster41 said...

@Bob: I know, I was just poking fun at the Muslims who make this claim (though none have actually suggested zionist time travelers, it's only slightly more crazy than Zionist sharks and Zionist pigeon spies, which Muslims really did claim).

I still don't understand how anyone can make this claim seriously.

bob said...

@ Foolster 41, even if someone were silly enough to claim that time travel is possible, one could always ask the question, "Where are all the tourists from the future?"

MataLoko said...

Its good to have these unfortunate events brought to everyone's attention as they often illustrates how Islams moral compass is way out of whack.

This sad boy was mainly segregated from British culture (law)and education. So is that His fault?

Why so many people here getting whip up into a frenzy? I can almost read between the lines to see calls for his guy to be stoned!
Ironic that such people would appose shariah posibly because they would not be the ones with the power to wheald it!

A thought, maybe better sentence him to a few years proper education and serious community service in the "wider community" where he may even assimilate some sensible community values. Imprisonment should be for protection of society not for punishment. should we not work toward ensuring he becomes a healthy member of society.

The Lesson is that Islamic schools need to be regulated with the same standards as others, Sharia should be OUTLAWED not condoned.

When will the "good Muslims" take any lessons from these sad stories?
So what are the sort of comments of Muslims on this Blog?
????
very sad indeed.

It is disappointing though that so many of the comments on this story, seem to be hateful in that they are directed at this young guy. Yes we hate the evil actions, the evil tenants of the Koran and Mohammed. but Please lets not allow ourselves to be justifiably labeled Muslim haters.

I don't Hate Muslims nor this Boy,

let us all have some compassion too, No?

Caricature said...

Loko,

Yea, it is sad.

It's sad to see what Islam does to a person's mind.

sherlock h said...

We're coming over to England for that fresh English meat. It's free !!! Yeah ! England's cool.

peejay said...

Even more worrying than the attitude of the law is that the DM the ONLY paper to report this!

managementguy said...

You idiots. Read the Quran and about the prophet (pbuh) and find out the context of what you learn before thinking negatively about Islam. And show me atleast one verse of the Quran or one place in the life of the prophet(pbuh)where it teaches that women are worthless or disgraced.

managementguy said...

Such ignorance. People, please pick up the Quran and the biography of prohet muhammad (pbuh) before you post negative comments about Islam. And find out the context of what you read. And where in the Quran or the life of prophet (pbuh) it mentions that women are worthless. Nowhere in the Quran will you find such teachings. Nowhere in the prophets (pbuh)life will you find that he disgraced or disrespected women. Islam respects women more than any other religion or way of life out there. It only certain individuals who do this and blame it on Islam. Blaming islam due to certain people or groups who claim they are muslim or claim they follow the true islam is just stereotypical. So please do not hold a grudge on Islam or the true Muslims who follow the true Islam, rather the hypocrites that claim to be amongst us.

Foolster41 said...

Another Muslim telling us we're just ignorant when we point out the abuses of women by Muslism that seems rampant! It must be our Kuffir imaginations! (Just like how we imagined 9/11, the hundreds of thousands dead since 9/11 and the long history of subjugation and murder since the birth of Islam! Perhaps it is a dream and all we have to do is wake the red king!)

So then I suppose you will try to explain away verses that say women can be beat (and no it doesn't say "lightly" in any original text) (Q 4:34, 38:44). Or perhaps explain how it is not inferiority to have your witness count as half as much as a man (Q 2:282, Bukhari 6:301 which states women are inferior!)

Or you can try to explan how the requirement of four witnesses to prove rape means women who are raped are often themselves punished (see: Q 2:282 again)

But even if we are misunderstanding, I have to ask you what I ask all Muslim apologists, if you are here, does that mean you are also spending as much time telling your co-coreligionists who are abusing woman's rights or subjugating non-believers (and indeed, there are supremiscists here even in the US and England)? If not, why not? I've yet to get a decent response.

Deleting said...

Management guy said, "... Islam respects women more than any other religion or way of life out there."

Prove it. Cite Surah and Ayat.

David said...

So, ignorance of the law IS an excuse, provided that you are not white.