Yep... not so new afteer all... published alreadie in january:http://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/129696it makes reference to the "Toronto Globe and Mail" as theire primary source...
While admitting that Israeli fire had not hit the school compound, Ging insisted it made little difference. “Forty-one innocent people were killed in the street... The State of Israel still has to answer for that,” he said...........u sure your talking about the same story????? offcourse since they are Palestinians, and Muslims, whats 41 dead civillians eh, just collateral, after all its Biblically sanctioned so there is nothing to answer for, 41 dead civillians, nahhh thats all good. well there will be an answer indeed, maybe not from the false god you guys believe in, but from the true God who will indeed punish the people who murder civillians and those who condone it rather condemn it.
Interesting how the muslims are quick to accuse of something based on hearsay, and yet deny the crucifixion which had multiple eye-witness attestation.
Sami... Sami...the pointe, I belibe, was not if a massacre existed... it was caused bie the Hamas lack off interest in peace...the point was iff a massacre existed inn the UN school as palestinians, falselly, saide...Are you speakking off colateral dammage? Do you mean the 80.000.000 deaths islam caused in India during 500 years (430 per day)?Now I understand whie you studie "creative writting"... you mustt be quite inventive to turne the violence commited bie islam in violence suffered bie islam...and since you did not unswer my previous questiones I put them here again:# 1: I saw youre debate with Doctor James White...coulde you tell me what kind of hair phollicle medicine do you use in order to habe susch an imponent hair (one of the beste aspects in your presentation...)?I habe a friende who suffers from hypotrichosis... thanks...# 2: could you pleasse explain to us all whie calling Muhammad a "pedophile" is an insult?perhaps you could start bie saying whatte you mean bie "pedophile"?would you agree that a "pedophile" is an adult personn who as an affective and/ore efective sexual inclination for prepubescent children?would you agree that Muhammed married baby Aiesha when she was 6 and consumed the marriege when she was 9?thanks...
Royal Son,the hadith is also mainly hearsay."I heard from A who heard it from B who heard it from ... that something amazing happened 200 years ago."
Very good point Matthew.
Sami wrote: “maybe not from the false god you guys believe in, but from the true God who will indeed punish the people who murder civillians and those who condone it rather condemn it”Then there will be a lot of Muslims being punished by the satan-like idol of Islam since Muslims refuse to condemn the murders perpetrated by their Muslim brethren.
Matthew wrote: “Royal Son,the hadith is also mainly hearsay."I heard from A who heard it from B who heard it from ... that something amazing happened 200 years ago."That’s exactly what is going on. Now look at the Muslim double standards: They claim that they don’t trust Paul because “Paul came later”. Paul joined the apostles 2 to 5 years after the ascension of Yeshua and lived and had fellowship with the eyewitnesses of the events he testifies about. He had an encounter with the Messiah and because he knew the eyewitnesses all he could say is “The Apostles told me that the Messiah said ….”Yet these same Muslims base their beliefs on the Hadits that they deem most authentic that are almost 40 to 100 times later compared to Paul. Those hadiths are based on reports from people that have no affiliation with their prophet whatsoever. All these people can say is “I, imam Buhkhari, heard from Abu that Ali said that Ahmed said that Fatima thought she heard Farida saying that she heard Zaid say that Abu Taleb said that Ibn Maja said that Bin Malik said that Urwah said that Khalid said that Ibn Abbas said that Umar said that the prophet said that ….”. As said often by several Christian apologists: Muslims have a complete disdain for historical facts and research. They spit in the face of history. Thats why Islam is without and will remain without merit.
Post a Comment