The Cartoon Controversy Returns (Part Two)

In response to a Muslim plot to assassinate one of the cartoonists who criticized Islam for being violent and intolerant, seventeen Danish newspapers have reprinted the cartoon. In an attempt to show that it is wrong to portray Islam as violent and intolerant, Muslims have responded by rioting and burning property.

Danish Youths Riot for Sixth Night, Several Arrests

Gaza Protest over Danish Cartoons

Pakistan Cartoon Protesters Burn Danish PM Effigy

Islamic Group Warns of "Bigger Conflict" over Denmark Cartoon

Geert Wilders and His Islam Film

Geert Wilders, member of the Dutch Parliament, is currently making a film criticizing Islam. If it's accurate, it will be a great benefit to the world.

TEASER FOR WILDERS'S FILM:


GEERT WILDERS DISCUSSES THE FILM (PART ONE):


GEERT WILDERS DISCUSSES THE FILM (PART TWO):


I guess the only question remaining is this: "What's up with Geert's hair?"

The Cartoon Controversy Returns

Just when everyone thought the cartoon controversy had ended, three dedicated Muslims are caught planning to assassinate one of the cartoonists. In response, Danish newspapers have reprinted the cartoon.

Danish Papers Reprint Muhammad Cartoon

Three Arrested in Plot to Kill Cartoonist

Jyllands-Posten Muhammad Cartoons Controversy

Is This Guy a Muslim or a Jehovah's Witness?

A man who calls himself "Ozzycda" has attempted to respond to James White's refutation of Deedat. Ozzycda tries to refute James's translation of John 1:1, yet anyone who paid attention for a single semester of Greek can see right through this response:



And James responds:

James White Responds to a Muslim Video

Question: Why is it that practically every Muslim video made to respond to Christianity is horribly inaccurate? Does this tell us anything about Islam?

Nadir Ahmed's Amazing Debate Format

I've been busy arranging a debate between James White and Nadir Ahmed, which is no easy task when Nadir's involved. Nadir originally demanded that James must not be allowed to point out inconsistencies during the debate. James refused (understandably), and Nadir finally agreed that James has the right to be logical.

But Nadir wasn't finished. James suggested a very reasonable debate format, but Nadir suggested one major modification: He demanded the right to be both the first speaker and the last speaker! His reasoning was as follows. Since he has agreed to speak first, he is at a disadvantage, since James will be able to respond to him. Therefore, to compensate for this disadvantage, he should be given the right to speak last.

Even more amazing is that James agreed to the format! Whatever one can say about this debate before it happens, one thing is clear. Nadir is doing everything he can to gain an unfair advantage prior to the debate, while James is so fearless that he's letting Nadir have an advantage. (Keep this in mind when you consider Nadir's complaints about his debate with Sam Shamoun, where his chief complaint was that the debate format was unfair--despite the fact that the rules were completely fair.)

One last point for Nadir's future debate opponents. Nadir has here declared that whoever speaks first should also be given the right to speak last. Keep this in mind when arranging a debate with Nadir. If you go first, you also get to go last. Nuff said?

James White Responds to Ahmed Deedat: Part One

This really bothers me. Deedat was one of the top Muslim apologists of the 20th century, yet he obviously makes no attempt to give his listeners accurate information about Christianity. I am appalled when Christian apologists misrepresent Islam. Yet when Muslim apologists misrepresent Christianity, Muslims just don't seem to care.